117
studies in a meta-analysis of practice based training. Knowledge decayed over time. Effects on skills and job behavior held steady or kept improving. The reps are the durable part.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005 ↗You already know the answer, and it is the reason renewal conversations are harder than they should be. Voohy is the practice layer you can put between your sessions, so the managers you work with get reps on your material, and you get to show a client behavior change rather than a feedback score.
No partner portal · No tiers · You talk to the founder
What your client’s manager practices
Assigned by you after week two of the program. The Underperformer: three sprints, three missed deadlines.
Priya
Hey, you wanted to talk? Things have been hectic. What is on your mind?
You
Thanks for making time. The last three sprint deliverables landed after the deadline. I want to understand what is going on, and what I can take off your plate.
↳Applied the model you taught in week two, under something close to real pressure, eleven days after the session.
Priya
I did not realise it was that visible. I have been stuck on the new architecture and thought I should figure it out alone.
Strong session
Up from 64 on the first attempt
✓ Made it safe to admit being stuck. That is your framework showing up in behavior, not on a feedback form.
✎ Resolution focus still trails. Useful material for your next session with this cohort.
You see the scores. Transcripts stay private to the manager.
The renewal conversation you want
From “they loved it” to “their managers improved.”
One of those is a compliment. The other is a reason to fund you again next year, and it is very hard to produce without data from between the sessions.
01 / Why partner
Your content is good. The room is engaged. And you still have no visibility into whether anything changed once everyone went back to their calendars. That is not a content problem, it is a missing practice layer.
117
studies in a meta-analysis of practice based training. Knowledge decayed over time. Effects on skills and job behavior held steady or kept improving. The reps are the durable part.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005 ↗44%
of managers worldwide report ever receiving formal training. Your addressable problem is most of the management population, not a niche.
Gallup, State of the Global Workplace ↗70%
of the variance in engagement between teams traces to the manager. It is the number that gets your proposal taken seriously by a CHRO.
Gallup, State of the American Manager ↗01
Every proposal on the CHRO’s desk promises frameworks and facilitation. Very few can say the managers will practice between sessions and you will show the competency movement.
02
A workshop ends. A practice program with assigned tracks, due dates and readiness data has a natural reason to run for a quarter and then be renewed.
03
Authoring AI characters, scoring transcripts across competencies and maintaining a scenario library is not a side project for a consulting practice. Use one that exists.
02 / How it works
Nothing about your program changes. The only new thing is what happens in the two weeks when you are not in the room.
Your model, your material, your facilitation. Voohy has no opinion about what you teach and never appears in front of your client as the main event.
Push a scenario or a track to the cohort with a due date, chosen to exercise whatever you just taught. Reminders handle the chasing.
Come back to the next session already knowing which competency the cohort is weak on and who has not started. That changes what you prepare.
03 / What you get
Deliberately light on process. There is no partner portal, no certification to earn and no tier to climb.
01
26+ authored scenarios across feedback, conflict, coaching, negotiation and retention, with AI characters who hold a position and push back.
02
Readiness per manager, team skill heatmap by competency, session counts, assignment tracking with overdue flags, exportable progress data.
03
Structured courses and three certification tracks earned on scored sessions, giving your program a visible finish line.
04
Practice authored around your own model rather than a generic one, so the reps exercise what you actually teach.
05
Either a referral share or seats at partner rates that you include in your own fee. Negotiated per partner, kept simple.
06
You work with the founder, a former VP of Engineering, not an account manager and a ticketing system.
04 / Fit
Worth being honest about both, because a partnership that does not fit wastes your time more than mine.
A good fit if
Probably not if
05 / Questions
Something not answered here? Write directly. You will get a real reply from the founder, usually within a day.
[email protected] →It is deliberately simple and negotiated per partner: either a referral arrangement where your client buys seats and you receive a share, or you buy seats at partner pricing and include them in your own program fee. Most independent consultants prefer the second, because it keeps the client relationship and the invoice entirely yours.
No. Voohy sits between your sessions rather than replacing any of them. You teach the framework the way you always have, and the managers get their reps on it during the two weeks before you see them again. That gap is where most programs quietly lose their effect.
You get the same admin view a company buyer gets: readiness per manager, a team skill heatmap by competency, session counts, and completion against whatever you assigned. Conversation transcripts stay private to the manager, which is what keeps the practice honest.
Custom scenario commissioning is available. If your program is built on a specific model, the practice can be authored to exercise that model rather than a generic one. Worth a conversation about scope before you commit it to a client proposal.
It works best when you already run manager or leadership development, your clients ask about measurement, and you have wished you could see what happens between sessions. It works badly as a product you resell without using, because the value shows up in how you use the data in your own coaching.
Write to the founder with what you run and who you run it for. You will get access to try it properly against your own material before any commercial conversation. There is no partner portal to sign up to and no tier structure to navigate.
Tell me what you run and who you run it for. You get proper access to try it against your own material before any commercial conversation happens.
No partner portal · No tiers · Direct to the founder